From Beginning to End

Wow Hex, that looks pretty great man. I think you just keep getting better and better...

https://i.gyazo.com/c9c8242d902b99ec90aeeea4d1e68da8.mp4

The Numbers Mason...what do they mean?

https://i.gyazo.com/c9c8242d902b99ec90aeeea4d1e68da8.mp4

The Numbers Mason...what do they mean?

Too many numbers, I stopped doing Algebra for a reason

From Beginning to End

will you stop flirting with me

 

Der Eisendrache Remade *cough* *cough*. Im jokin it looks amazing! cant wait to try it 

https://i.gyazo.com/c9c8242d902b99ec90aeeea4d1e68da8.mp4

The Numbers Mason...what do they mean?

I dont know any F***ing numbers! Who the hell are you people!!!

An Update:

We just did a coop test with three people and hit the image limit, but we made it in game with 2.  So, we are really close (hitting image limit with 3 people came from it loading 3 character files instead of 2).  Over the next few days we will try to optimize the hell out of the map (like what we did for leviathan), but it is not looking good for some of the features I had planned.  So I bring up the question: would the community be OK with T4m and the full Ragnarok experience, or would we have to release a scaled back version that runs on the normal w@w.

An Update:

We just did a coop test with three people and hit the image limit, but we made it in game with 2.  So, we are really close (hitting image limit with 3 people came from it loading 3 character files instead of 2).  Over the next few days we will try to optimize the hell out of the map (like what we did for leviathan), but it is not looking good for some of the features I had planned.  So I bring up the question: would the community be OK with T4m and the full Ragnarok experience, or would we have to release a scaled back version that runs on the normal w@w.

Why not both? or make a low definition version (like ConvicioNDR did with his map) for non T4M Users

An Update:

We just did a coop test with three people and hit the image limit, but we made it in game with 2.  So, we are really close (hitting image limit with 3 people came from it loading 3 character files instead of 2).  Over the next few days we will try to optimize the hell out of the map (like what we did for leviathan), but it is not looking good for some of the features I had planned.  So I bring up the question: would the community be OK with T4m and the full Ragnarok experience, or would we have to release a scaled back version that runs on the normal w@w.

I would take T4M over a watered-down map any day of the week. Most T4M fixes are minor tweaks anyway, it's not worth losing entire features over!

But be aware pie. Most of the youtuber dudes will not play the map. Coz of t4m. Just saying.

But be aware pie. Most of the youtuber dudes will not play the map. Coz of t4m. Just saying.

Oh no, YouTubers not being able to play the map? How disastrous 

But be aware pie. Most of the youtuber dudes will not play the map. Coz of t4m. Just saying.

Please stop talking crap Tim. Some people might actually believe this.

An Update:

We just did a coop test with three people and hit the image limit, but we made it in game with 2.  So, we are really close (hitting image limit with 3 people came from it loading 3 character files instead of 2).  Over the next few days we will try to optimize the hell out of the map (like what we did for leviathan), but it is not looking good for some of the features I had planned.  So I bring up the question: would the community be OK with T4m and the full Ragnarok experience, or would we have to release a scaled back version that runs on the normal w@w.

Obviously go the T4M route, shouldn't even be a question.

So I bring up the question: would the community be OK with T4m and the full Ragnarok experience, or would we have to release a scaled back version that runs on the normal w@w.

Full. Ragnarok. Experience.

And then maybe a scaled back version with only WAW weapons or else some people in the community won't play it 

Full Ragnarok experience, you should make it as good as posible