Posts
213
Respect
39Add +1
Forum Rank
Mr. Elemental
Primary Group
Member
Login Issues
Forgot password?Activate Issues
Account activation email not received? Wrong account activation email used?Other Problems?
Contact Support - Help Center Get help on the UGX Discord. Join it now!I haven't actually played this map, but 26/40 seems like a ridiculously high score? At least with what you're saying throughout the review.
All of the features (guns, PaP textures, etc.) are just default UGX mod features, and they're not even from the latest edition of the mod. And the mapper apparently couldn't be assed to fix the shitty viewhands that make the PC look like a 90-y/o woman with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.
If you haven't played UGX 1.0, then I can understand how the map might be pleasing to you, but for everyone who's already played the mod there's barely any incentive to go and play a map that looks ugly and has no real selling points besides the mod -- especially when there are better examples of maps that use it.
For the record I do think that this was actually a good, even-handed review, but it seems to me like you went "soft" (or maybe even flaccid) on the mapper because you think he has potential. Don't. Do the opposite: I would be disappointed as hell if someone I thought had potential shat out a boxy map in 15 hr. with UGX as its only real feature. You can only help someone improve by providing criticism when it's necessary, and at times like this, it IS necessary to be harsh.
Benevolent Soul who has our eternal gratitude and exclusive access to betas and the donator section of the forum. | |
UGX V.I.P. | |
Has released one or more maps to the UGX-Mods community which have been added to the UGX Map Manager. | |
BO3 Modtools Alpha | This user has access to the Black Ops 3 Modtools Alpha |
wait are u saying the guns were a pro cause that was the old ugx mod in use there
Has released one or more maps to the UGX-Mods community which have been added to the UGX Map Manager. |
And the mapper apparently couldn't be assed to fix the shitty viewhands that make the PC look like a 90-y/o woman with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.
Benevolent Soul who has our eternal gratitude and exclusive access to betas and the donator section of the forum. | |
Has permission to post map review topics in the Custom Map Reviews section of the forum. |
Aye mate you don't know me so y don't you shut tf up ok buddy
Benevolent Soul who has our eternal gratitude and exclusive access to betas and the donator section of the forum. | |
Box Mappers Elite | |
Has released one or more maps to the UGX-Mods community which have been added to the UGX Map Manager. | |
Has shown effort and knowledge in the area of scripting while being a part of the UGX-Mods community. |
I'm sorry but I just find this hilarious XD
Good review ShotgunRagtime! Although I would maybe have said a 21/40 because let's face it, it's just the regular UGX mod that was just slapped onto the map like many others so it's nothing new or special.
I haven't actually played this map, but 26/40 seems like a ridiculously high score? At least with what you're saying throughout the review.
All of the features (guns, PaP textures, etc.) are just default UGX mod features, and they're not even from the latest edition of the mod. And the mapper apparently couldn't be assed to fix the shitty viewhands that make the PC look like a 90-y/o woman with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.
If you haven't played UGX 1.0, then I can understand how the map might be pleasing to you, but for everyone who's already played the mod there's barely any incentive to go and play a map that looks ugly and has no real selling points besides the mod -- especially when there are better examples of maps that use it.
For the record I do think that this was actually a good, even-handed review, but it seems to me like you went "soft" (or maybe even flaccid) on the mapper because you think he has potential. Don't. Do the opposite: I would be disappointed as hell if someone I thought had potential shat out a boxy map in 15 hr. with UGX as its only real feature. You can only help someone improve by providing criticism when it's necessary, and at times like this, it IS necessary to be harsh.
Maybe that's his, ahem, style, you know what I mean?
Huh? Xperience wrote the review.