Posts
1,864
Respect
330Add +1
Forum Rank
Zombie Destroyer
Primary Group
Community Mapper
Login Issues
Forgot password?Activate Issues
Account activation email not received? Wrong account activation email used?Other Problems?
Contact Support - Help Center Get help on the UGX Discord. Join it now!Aye mate you don't know me so y don't you shut tf up ok buddy
Benevolent Soul who has our eternal gratitude and exclusive access to betas and the donator section of the forum. | |
Box Mappers Elite | |
Has released one or more maps to the UGX-Mods community which have been added to the UGX Map Manager. | |
Has shown effort and knowledge in the area of scripting while being a part of the UGX-Mods community. |
Benevolent Soul who has our eternal gratitude and exclusive access to betas and the donator section of the forum. | |
UGX V.I.P. | |
Has released one or more maps to the UGX-Mods community which have been added to the UGX Map Manager. | |
Oil Rig Beta Access |
Map is easily, if not greater than 3arc maps I've seen, I would have given it 40/40, guns don't make a map, have you not forgotten the other content in the map?
The detail is the best I've seen out of anyone on this site, and the fun scale and re-playablity is so high. 2 low score 4 me
I would've given it a 40/40 as well. This map is amazing
I find this quite often. People saying a great map, like Leviathan, Project C, Das Herrenhaus deserves a 40/40.
I think Leviathan and Das Herrenhaus deserve 40/40 tbh.
Benevolent Soul who has our eternal gratitude and exclusive access to betas and the donator section of the forum. | |
Has shown effort and knowledge in the area of scripting while being a part of the UGX-Mods community. |
theres a lot of things i wanna say about this but i shall not
But i will point out the obvious, half the "custom content" has not even had a mention at all ( traps, bosses, the custom WW etc )
Yet the "guns" got several mentions solely for being stale, despite it being perfectly in fitting with the map...
Ofc im not telling you to change your score or opinion on this - it is your own - but i think this is proper unfair
im not a reviewer so...
Benevolent Soul who has our eternal gratitude and exclusive access to betas and the donator section of the forum. | |
Box Mappers Elite | |
Has released one or more maps to the UGX-Mods community which have been added to the UGX Map Manager. | |
Has shown effort and knowledge in the area of scripting while being a part of the UGX-Mods community. |
I find this quite often. People saying a great map, like Leviathan, Project C, Das Herrenhaus deserves a 40/40.
In my opinion, it should be something to motivate you, don't just give people 40/40. You want to strive to work harder and harder to make better content with higher quality, and if someone tells you you're 40/40, you don't need to work much harder. No matter how good you are, always work to achieve greater results! 8)
Benevolent Soul who has our eternal gratitude and exclusive access to betas and the donator section of the forum. | |
Has shown effort and knowledge in the area of scripting while being a part of the UGX-Mods community. |
So you're saying, even if a map deserves 40/40, we still shouldn't give it 40/40? Logic?
So you're saying, even if a map deserves 40/40, we still shouldn't give it 40/40? Logic?
No no, you've got it all wrong here. I feel there are maps that definetly DESERVE 40/40. But it's like this: You get 39/40, that tells you that damn, I should work harder on my next work, to gain that 40/40. A motivation per say. Getting 40/40 doesn't mean you're done, obviously? But it's better for you, the creator, that want to make the best content you possibly can, to hear that, you know, maybe adding more work into this will be benefitial? It's just a way to tell the creators that that they should work harder. That's how I see it. Rating is more than just this though, it gives a general idea of how good the map is from a certain point of view. I apologize if I did not phrase this in a way that was sufficient enough for you to understand how I see it.
So on the reviewers part, they think the map deserves 40/40, but because they want to 'motivate' (I'd posit that anyone who makes a 40/40 map is already sufficiently motivated but I digress) them to strive for more, they have to MAKE UP a reason to take some points off? So for example, they give the map 9/10 for detail even though they think it's a 10/10.
Yeh, I'm sorry but that's just retarded.