Map is easily, if not greater than 3arc maps I've seen, I would have given it 40/40, guns don't make a map, have you not forgotten the other content in the map?

The detail is the best I've seen out of anyone on this site, and the fun scale and re-playablity is so high. 2 low score 4 me

Map is easily, if not greater than 3arc maps I've seen, I would have given it 40/40, guns don't make a map, have you not forgotten the other content in the map?

The detail is the best I've seen out of anyone on this site, and the fun scale and re-playablity is so high. 2 low score 4 me

I would've given it a 40/40 as well. This map is amazing

I would've given it a 40/40 as well. This map is amazing

I find this quite often. People saying a great map, like Leviathan, Project C, Das Herrenhaus deserves a 40/40.
In my opinion, it should be something to motivate you, don't just give people 40/40. You want to strive to work harder and harder to make better content with higher quality, and if someone tells you you're 40/40, you don't need to work much harder. No matter how good you are, always work to achieve greater results!  8)

I find this quite often. People saying a great map, like Leviathan, Project C, Das Herrenhaus deserves a 40/40.

I think Leviathan and Das Herrenhaus deserve 40/40 tbh.

I think Leviathan and Das Herrenhaus deserve 40/40 tbh.

I love the maps, fantasticly well made, but I don't think anything deserves 40/40. In my opinion, it should be a goal you strive to achieve, to push yourself to work harder and better. 

theres a lot of things i wanna say about this but i shall not

But i will point out the obvious, half the "custom content" has not even had a mention at all ( traps, bosses, the custom WW etc )

Yet the "guns" got several mentions solely for being stale, despite it being perfectly in fitting with the map...

Ofc im not telling you to change your score or opinion on this - it is your own - but i think this is proper unfair

theres a lot of things i wanna say about this but i shall not

But i will point out the obvious, half the "custom content" has not even had a mention at all ( traps, bosses, the custom WW etc )

Yet the "guns" got several mentions solely for being stale, despite it being perfectly in fitting with the map...

Ofc im not telling you to change your score or opinion on this - it is your own - but i think this is proper unfair

People should look with a more wider perspective on everything the map has to offer. Maybe you're not much into using traps, but try it out. Maybe you don't like bosses, but try to see the pro's in it, not just the con's. It's the Reviewer's opinion on it, but I feel it's at least decent to try everything out, instead of including the things you felt should've been included.

i was going to say the GUNS not being "good" is personal opinion (yet there are custom ones if you havent got them yet) but did you do easteregg? did you notice nova crawlers? did you see custom scripted boss not crawler? did you see the traps made custom for the map? did you know there is buildable tables around the map? and i havent even discovered it all despite beta testing it for months... im just wondering if this things are the 8 points or is something left out? i dont think it needs a ROUND COUNTER and BUYABLE ending for the full 10 points but then again im not a reviewer so...

im not a reviewer so...

..your opinion is invalid. You have no idea what it takes to make a good map Radimax so just be quiet until you gain the skills to become a map reviewer.

yeah it takes years to master it stevie i got no chance, but concidering my next map will have 50% or less features of das herrenhause its doomed to be below 20/40 score so might aswell cancel it before its to late 

I find this quite often. People saying a great map, like Leviathan, Project C, Das Herrenhaus deserves a 40/40.
In my opinion, it should be something to motivate you, don't just give people 40/40. You want to strive to work harder and harder to make better content with higher quality, and if someone tells you you're 40/40, you don't need to work much harder. No matter how good you are, always work to achieve greater results!  8)

So you're saying, even if a map deserves 40/40, we still shouldn't give it 40/40? Logic?

So you're saying, even if a map deserves 40/40, we still shouldn't give it 40/40? Logic?

yea i dont get it either

giving it a top score doesnt mean - your done now, go home

means you did extremely well, and will need to work just as hard on your next project

So you're saying, even if a map deserves 40/40, we still shouldn't give it 40/40? Logic?

No no, you've got it all wrong here. I feel there are maps that definetly DESERVE 40/40. But it's like this: You get 39/40, that tells you that damn, I should work harder on my next work, to gain that 40/40. A motivation per say. Getting 40/40 doesn't mean you're done, obviously? But it's better for you, the creator, that want to make the best content you possibly can, to hear that, you know, maybe adding more work into this will be benefitial? It's just a way to tell the creators that that they should work harder. That's how I see it. Rating is more than just this though, it gives a general idea of how good the map is from a certain point of view. I apologize if I did not phrase this in a way that was sufficient enough for you to understand how I see it.

No no, you've got it all wrong here. I feel there are maps that definetly DESERVE 40/40. But it's like this: You get 39/40, that tells you that damn, I should work harder on my next work, to gain that 40/40. A motivation per say. Getting 40/40 doesn't mean you're done, obviously? But it's better for you, the creator, that want to make the best content you possibly can, to hear that, you know, maybe adding more work into this will be benefitial? It's just a way to tell the creators that that they should work harder. That's how I see it. Rating is more than just this though, it gives a general idea of how good the map is from a certain point of view. I apologize if I did not phrase this in a way that was sufficient enough for you to understand how I see it.

So on the reviewers part, they think the map deserves 40/40, but because they want to 'motivate' (I'd posit that anyone who makes a 40/40 map is already sufficiently motivated but I digress) them to strive for more, they have to MAKE UP a reason to take some points off? So for example, they give the map 9/10 for detail even though they think it's a 10/10.

Yeh, I'm sorry but that's just retarded.

So on the reviewers part, they think the map deserves 40/40, but because they want to 'motivate' (I'd posit that anyone who makes a 40/40 map is already sufficiently motivated but I digress) them to strive for more, they have to MAKE UP a reason to take some points off? So for example, they give the map 9/10 for detail even though they think it's a 10/10.

Yeh, I'm sorry but that's just retarded.

Yeah, your opinion on it. I'm not saying people HAVE to make the maps less than 40/40, but it's good to think through properly, so you don't think too fast, and give a map 40/40 when it might not be deserving of this. I'm not saying you make up a reason, but don't judge too hasty. You make a map that is 40/40 quality, like Leviathan, Oil Rig, Project C and Das Herrenhaus, and I know you're well motivated and experienced. Obviously! But motivation is not something you can have too much of, so it's only good. I realise my opinion is a unpopular opinion, so be it.