Bug Report:
You loose only Quick Revive in first dead, and at second you get all Perks back.
Same like in the Map Lake Michigan.

But thx good work i search for a while for such an Tutorial.

Electric Cherry:
specialty_boost
shader = "cherry_vending_zombies";

Vultaire AID:
specialty_ordinance
shader = "vulture_vending_zombies_0"; 

Vutaire works too but without the green light around the shader.

It's perma perks. , removes quick revive in solo or else you'll have infinite solo revives when using black ops style quick revive.

self UnSetPerk("specialty_quickrevive"); // change specialty_quickrevive to all without ""
self thread maps\_zombiemode_perks::perk_hud_destroy( "specialty_quickrevive" ); // same here

Hm sry, but for me this looks more than a Bug like planned, when you go down ... loose all Perks and see at same moment Perks coming back one by one.
Same when you die completely you'll see the end game camera with returning your Perks one by one and last flip.

Is there a way, to stop this? Makin it not perma?

#include common_scripts\utility;
#include maps\_utility;
#include maps\_zombiemode_utility;

main()
{
	thread give_player_perks();
}

give_player_perks()
{
	players = get_players();
	for( i = 0; i < players.size; i++ )
	{
	players[i] thread give_all_perks();
	}
}

give_all_perks()
{
	flag_wait("all_players_connected");
 
	wait .3;
 
	perks = [];
	perks[0] = "specialty_armorvest"; //Juggernog
	perks[1] = "specialty_rof"; //Double tap
	perks[2] = "specialty_fastreload";//speed cola
	perks[3] = "specialty_detectexplosive";//PHD flopper
	perks[4] = "specialty_bulletaccuracy";//deadshot
	perks[5] = "specialty_extraammo";//mule kick
	perks[6] = "specialty_longersprint";// staminup
	//perks[7] = "speciality_whatever_perk";// IF YOU HAVE MORE PERKS YOU WANT TO ADD, THEN CHANGE "speciality_whatever_perk" TO THE STRING NAME OF THE PERK YOU WILL ADD. THEN CONTINUE LIKE THAT WHEN ADDING MORE PERKS. AND CHANGE THE NUMBER AT EVERY PERK YOU ADD LIKE. "perks[number]"

	for(p=0;p<perks.size;p++)
	{
		if(!self HasPerk(perks[p]))
		{
			self setperk(perks[p]);
 
			if(perks[p] == "specialty_armorvest")
			{
				self.maxhealth = level.zombie_vars["zombie_perk_juggernaut_health"];
				self.health = level.zombie_vars["zombie_perk_juggernaut_health"];
			}				
			self maps\_zombiemode_perks::perk_hud_create( perks[p] );
			self thread maps\_zombiemode_perks::perk_think( perks[p] );
		}
		wait .3;
	}
}

Well if you look at the script to see what things are called, it is indeed not a bug.

I think this will make it non permanent:

Well you're right that makes it non permanent, thx man.
Must have overseen something. 

Permanent perks are not an bad idea as an good ee reward.
To make it more perfectly can you script it like that you only loose quick revive? And not loose all and give them back?
Or stop the give perk back when you are totally dead?

Well you're right that makes it non permanent, thx man.
Must have overseen something. 

Permanent perks are not an bad idea as an good ee reward.
To make it more perfectly can you script it like that you only loose quick revive? And not loose all and give them back?
Or stop the give perk back when you are totally dead?

Sure i like it and you make it nice and easy Ege, thx man!  8)  (i've added respect to you and the other 2 PRO's) 

---

Double Post Merge: August 21, 2014, 01:14:26 pm

---

for the perk give problem at total death, it might give an easy solution.
in your script i see, there is an

self waittill_any( "fake_death", "death", "player_downed" );

ive tried to seperate the "death"
like

give_player_perks()
{
while(1)
    {
    self waittill_any( "fake_death", "death", "player_downed" );
    
    if( self == "death" )
    {
    return;
    }
    else
    {
        players = get_players();
	for( i = 0; i < players.size; i++ )
	{
	players[i] thread give_all_perks();
	players[i] thread remove_revive_solo();
	}
    }
}

And hope that it returns out of this function without giving perks, when you are dead.
Should this work or see someone a bug?

Awesome tutorial and script, works great
Also, would you mind if I used a bit of this as a reference? I'm working on a script and I'm bad with arrays