Login Issues
Forgot password?Activate Issues
Account activation email not received? Wrong account activation email used?Other Problems?
Contact Support - Help Center Get help on the UGX Discord. Join it now!I enjoy new map reviews but i don't think the soul boxes are a problem. They're an option to use or not and in my opinion, doesn't restrict player freedom. In short, they optional.
(Image removed from quote.)
Indeed. There are much better things to be doing with one's time.
A misunderstanding on both ends my good sir, though I feel I was wrong for keeping it going. I do feel it should be dropped. If you ever feel what I said, no matter how minute, offended you, you are always free to approach me through PM.
I will just make this comment now. Even though I dont like these kinds of jokes myself, Im not saying reviewer should stop them immediately, as they are not directed towards anyone. If they would be, then it would be a issue. Also:
This was not offending reviewer at all. He stated his opinion and didnt only comment on that, but said the review was good none the less. He was stating his opinion in a non-rude way
Again, this is why we have talked about locking the review section from comments, it can go way too easily off-topic, as seen here
Shotgun, I won't forgive you if you quit making reviews. You seriously brought up a new and much more addicting theme of reviews which felt much more appealing than the plain old "pros and cons" theme. Keep those reviews coming man, good job.
I do want to point out I didn't say it was an "issue" nor did it "offend me", nor did I say it was innappropiate, just....didn't fit, but he obviously took it a little personally, I didn't think he would, since it was such a minute comment in an also positive comment, nor did I think he would have made such a big deal over it.
Every person has their own style of humour and I don't find yours particularly distasteful. As a map reviewer I believe you choose the right choice of words to explain what you mean even if it can be considered somewhat offensive to some it doesn't to me. This is an 18 rated game we are playing here and we should all be able to act like adults about things like this. If it was Tomikaze who chose this style of wording I don't think it would have been an issue with some so I am not sure why it is an issue with you.
At the end of the day it was mearly an attempt at making your review humourous and I didn't find it inappropriate. Please do not change your style just because some members find it degrading towards a map. I would rather see you be yourself than pretend to be someone else just to please others. The thing that makes each member unique is how they are, not how they pretend to be. I enjoy your reviews and would rather you continued them as you do currently.
Nobody is asking you to drop the humor, but jokes like this:
Do not fit a review like this, what relevance does a joke about fucking your mother with a bag over her head have to do with the map?
You're talking my small comment too personally, if you think this is a waste of time and want to quit, that's your own prerogative.
So...
A third Review aye? Not sure it was necessary at this point, but anywho.
Can't say I enjoyed reading this review. It's got some points in it where I just think 'why?'
Some of the sexual jokes, etc. didn't really fit the review imo but good review none the less, I highly suggest anyone who is into CoDZombies give this a go.
You're 'currently working' on a review? Damn, I didn't realise reviewers spent this long on them, anyway I digress.
A simple solution to the 'noobs can't be trusted' conundrum is like I said, any coloured ranked member can vote (from Famous Male Pornstars to Mapper Elites and everything in between) - I can't see how anyone would have opposition to that?
And the tracking downloads thing would be impossible since most maps are linked through Mega/Mediafire, etc and not through the site directly.
And I think people are still getting hung up on the name. I repeat 'First Mappers' or w/e it should be called is a EUPHEMISM, stop taking it literally. We all know it really means 'Shit Maps' but of course we can't have that as a section (sigh), it DOESN'T MATTER if it's your first or 100th map; if it's shit it goes there, if it's good it doesn't. End of.
The reviews are so damn lengthy half the time. Thats why I never read them.
Here is a new idea then: Implement a rating system and only map reviewers can review the maps. Now map reviewers have purpose other than writing witty novels for a map review.