Heard my name. DD GET BACK IN YOUR CAGE!
I do see his point to a certain extent. Paying for the donator perks of knowledge, I feel, is okay. When it comes to donating for "perks" with unset donation prices the "perk holder" can change at any time is different. I especially have issues with the "perk" not being shared because a certain "donation limit" hasn't been reached. Withholding some perks that will extremely help the community because you want people to "donate" for them and those people get a temper on about people wanting it is being a bit of a dick. Especially if the whole community has knowledge that these "perks" can be shared to everyone. That's my rant. Like, favorite, and subscribe.